<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NH Medical Malpractice Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Avandia Settlement: Most cases settled. But not all of them</title>
		<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-personal-injury/avandia-settlement-most-cases-settled-but-not-all-of-them</link>
		<comments>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-personal-injury/avandia-settlement-most-cases-settled-but-not-all-of-them#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacuetical (Drug) Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avandia Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avandia Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes mellitus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlaxoSmithKline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Avandia, the diabetes drug that in the news right now is connected with heart attacks.  Approximately 10,000 of the currently 13,000 lawsuits pending are going to be settled as part of this settlement. GlaxoSmithKline Plc agreed to pay about $460 million to resolve a majority of lawsuits alleging the company’s Avandia diabetes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GSK_HQ.jpg"><img title="Glaxo Smith Kline's HQ building taken from Bos..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/GSK_HQ.jpg/300px-GSK_HQ.jpg" alt="Glaxo Smith Kline's HQ building taken from Bos..." width="300" height="210" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GSK_HQ.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Avandia, the diabetes drug that in the news right now is connected with heart attacks.  Approximately 10,000 of the currently 13,000 lawsuits pending are going to be settled as part of this settlement.</p>
<blockquote><p>GlaxoSmithKline Plc agreed to  pay about $460 million to resolve a majority of lawsuits alleging the company’s Avandia diabetes drug can cause heart attacks and strokes, people familiar with the accords said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/health/main6675648.shtml">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/health/main6675648.shtml</a></p></blockquote>
<p>While this may be a big step for resolving a lot of the lawsuits, it is not the final conclusion of all the cases. In most cases and I expect it is the same with this one, each person will have the opportunity to opt out of the settlement and continue to pursue a lawsuit outside of the settlement.  Now I can&#8217;t say that this is what you should or not do, it&#8217;s just a possible option.</p>
<p>In even more significant and shocking news is that a report from the Senate indicates</p>
<blockquote><p>The maker of controversial diabetes drug Avandia knew for around a  decade that the medication increased risks of heart problems in patients  but covered up that fact from the public, according to a <a href="http://finance.senate.gov/newsroom/chairman/release/?id=bcf5aef6-9bc5-45ca-9cab-aadf5df135fa">Senate Finance Committee</a> probe.</p>
<p>Internal company emails showed GlaxoSmithKline &#8220;attempted to  downplay scientific findings about he safety of Avandia as far back as  2000,&#8221; according to a committee press release.</p>
<p>According to a New York Times report Tuesday, SmithKline Beecham  began testing on the drug in 1999 to see how it compared to a rival  pill, the Takeda-manufactured Actos. The results showed signs that  Avandia posed a heart risk.</p>
<p>In a March 29, 2001 e-mail about the study, SmithKline executive Dr.  Martin I. Freed wrote: &#8220;This was done for the U.S. business, way under  the radar. Per Sr. Mgmt request, these data should not see the light of  day to anyone outside of GSK.&#8221; The company became GlaxoSmithKline after a  2000 merger.  <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/health/main6673320.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/health/main6673320.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody</a></p></blockquote>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/glaxosmithkline-settles-avandia-lawsuits-fda/19552849/?zemanta-tracking">GlaxoSmithKline Settles Majority of Avandia Lawsuits Ahead of FDA Panel Vote</a> (dailyfinance.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www10.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/opinion/15thu1.html?_r=5&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">Editorial: The Avandia Saga Continues</a> (nytimes.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=1dadb74b-536c-406d-bf1e-00dc2c86334e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" title="Avandia Settlement: Most cases settled. But not all of them" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-personal-injury/avandia-settlement-most-cases-settled-but-not-all-of-them/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Don’t Get Rich with Lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/tort-reform/you-dont-get-rich-with-lawsuits</link>
		<comments>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/tort-reform/you-dont-get-rich-with-lawsuits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tort Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plaintiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punitive damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this over at the South Carolina Nursing Home Blog.  Look at how small the amount is for the median damage award.  It&#8217;s only $28,000.  The vast majority of people do not win millions of dollars. Major findings from the 2005 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts include— • A jury decided almost 70% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I read this over at the <a href="http://www.scnursinghomelaw.com/2010/05/articles/tort-reform/the-myth-of-jackpot-justice/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SouthCarolinaNursingHomeBlog+%28South+Carolina+Nursing+Home+Blog%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">South Carolina Nursing Home Blog</a>.  Look at how small the amount is for the median damage award.  It&#8217;s only $28,000.  The vast majority of people do not win millions of dollars.</p>
<blockquote><p>Major findings from the 2005 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts  include—<br />
• A jury decided almost 70% of the approximately 26,950 general civil  trials disposed of in 2005.<br />
• About 60% of the general civil trials included in the survey involved a  tort claim and about a third involved contractual issues.  Most of the  tort cases involved motor vehicle accidents.<br />
• Plaintiffs won in almost 60% of trials overall.<br />
• The median damage award for plaintiffs who won monetary damages in  general civil trials was $28,000.<br />
• Punitive damages were awarded to only 5% of plaintiff winners in  general civil trials in 2005.<br />
• In the nation’s 75 most populous counties, the number of general civil  cases disposed of by jury or bench trial declined by about 50% from  1992 to 2005.</p>
<p>Almost two-thirds (62%) of all plaintiff award winners were awarded  $50,000 or less. A small percentage (about 4%) of all plaintiff award  winners were awarded $1 million or more.</p>
<p>There were only 2,449 trials involving medical malpractice which  amounts to 9.1%.  This is interesting since we know there are 100,000  deaths caused every year from medical malpractice.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to the South Carolina Nursing Home Blog for finding this.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=302e9582-613e-4b1a-8bcd-287fc6256ac4" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" title="You Don’t Get Rich with Lawsuits" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/tort-reform/you-dont-get-rich-with-lawsuits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birth Complications happen more at night</title>
		<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/birth-complications-happen-more-at-night</link>
		<comments>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/birth-complications-happen-more-at-night#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cerebral Palsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebral palsy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study recently completed shows that complications arising form birth happen more frequently at night Picking the time of day to give birth may not be a choice many women can make but it could influence her chances of a smooth delivery, according to a Dutch research. A study of more than 700,000 births at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A study recently completed shows that complications arising form birth happen more frequently at night</p>
<blockquote><p>Picking the time of day to give birth may not be a choice many women  can make but it could influence her chances of a smooth delivery,  according to a Dutch research.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">A study of more than 700,000 births at Dutch hospitals between 2000 and  2006 found that the risks of newborn death and admission to the </span><span style="color: #000000;">neonatal intensive care unit</span><span style="color: #000000;"> were higher with nighttime than daytime deliveries</span>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The study found that the rates of injury where generally higher overnight.  The story does go on to say that in developed countries the risk of birth injury is still very low indeed.  <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100614/lf_nm_life/us_births_complications" class="broken_link">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100614/lf_nm_life/us_births_complications</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/birth-complications-happen-more-at-night/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Malpractice Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-medical-malpractice/medical-malpractice-basics</link>
		<comments>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-medical-malpractice/medical-malpractice-basics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Medical Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8xdY_KLsxXg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8xdY_KLsxXg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/new-hampshire-medical-malpractice/medical-malpractice-basics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cerebral Palsy Statute of Limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/cerebral-palsy-statute-of-limitations</link>
		<comments>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/cerebral-palsy-statute-of-limitations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cerebral Palsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Medical Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cerebral Palsy Statute of Limitations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GkgsruynC18&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GkgsruynC18&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br />
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkgsruynC18">Cerebral Palsy Statute of Limitations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nh-medical-malpractice-law-blog.com/cerebral-palsy/cerebral-palsy-statute-of-limitations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
